Should there be a new categorie : " Iskcon Controversial " ?
Philosophy · asked by user [] · 2007-08-28 · 10 answers
...or something similiar,this way devotees who are disturbed by discussions that concern The International Society for Krishna Consciouness history and its Governing Body Commision will find it much easier to avoid this sort of content.Maybe there can also be a " Iskcon-lite " catagorie.
user [144] · 2007-08-28
Yes. Thats a good idea.user [38] · 2007-08-28
There are many forums where these discussions are going on. Why this forum cant remain focused on pari-prashna, questions about higher topics? It is doing quite well.user [140] · 2007-08-28
I think you have proven my point Prabhu," questions about higher topics? " is not discissions on "The International Society for Krishna Consciouness history and its Governing Body Commision " not a higher topic, I havent read anything about it in the papers lately.user [18] · 2007-08-28
maybe we can make one "Tulsiananda", so everybody that does not like your posts can block it. :)user [38] · 2007-08-28
Legal and managerial topics are certainly not equal to philosophical and theological ones.user [33] · 2007-08-28
[quote][cite] diyourself:[/cite]maybe we can make one "Tulsiananda", so everybody that does not like your posts can block it. :)[/quote]Admin should consider deleting this post. It borders on a personal attack.
user [140] · 2007-08-28
I agree,thats why I mentioned making a new category,I dont think there is anything wrong with " Legal and managerial " questions,some of us enjoy them.user [19] · 2007-08-28
if you call it controversial you make people post controversial things only.We have now "Social" which seems better to me.
Dont be controversial tulsi.
user [13] · 2007-08-28
I think its better to stay on issues, rather than get into peoples personal affairs here. Of course, if you want to share about yourself, thats cool. But talking about other people is not really productive. It very quickly becomes gramya-katha, if it doesnt start out as that.user [40] · 2007-08-30
prajalpa